Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Indigenous to International Urban Insert in Gokarna Town

Hima C S

Abstract


Contrast way of life at Gokarna town—the title itself tells the vibrant culture of the place it holds within. Sensing the place through two characters, author perceives the contrast image that town Gokarna builds. Character one here refers to the local resident which author qualifies as Indigenous/Emigrants, (Brahmin, Hallakki, Ambiga, Agar). Character two represents Migrants/International [short term/long term: Videshis, Yatri’s (Pilgrims), Resort Owners, Indian Tourist (Pravasigaru)]. The vision of both the characters is Interdependent. Character 1 Vision seeks for changes and upgrades the awareness among the communities, to get interlinked. Character 2 Vision looks to build in knowledge, awareness among the communities, clean and hygiene Gokarna. Author aims at a model town to lead cohesion and enhance the built forms with natural system which is the true essence of the town. Objective “Enhancing water system with visitor’s integration through man made elements and policies to guide future developments at Gokarna”. The queries the author would like to interpret in this article would be:

  • How the Gokarna temple town creates space for migrants?
  • How these foreigners make themselves comfortable in the town?
  • Do these transitions affect the life style of the local communities and how do they respond to the changes?
  • How the migrants get linked with the local communities understand the culture and interpretant so that few communities get dependent on the migrants, may be in terms of knowledge exchange, job opportunities and also grab opportunities to gain more income with new trends?

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jyothi Hosagrahar, Indigenous Modernities: Negotiating Architecture and Urbanism. Indigenous Modernities: Negotiating Architecture and Urbanism. 2007 [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: http://www.caareviews.org/reviews/1062#.XvMoFZozbIU

Shanta Narayan Upadyay Gokaranada Aa Dinagalu

Lynch K. The City Image and its Elements from the Image of the City (1960). Available from: http://www.

sethspielman.org/courses/geog3612/readings/Lynch.PDF

Patrick Geddes in India–Jaqueline Tyrwhitt Editor; Select Books, 71, Brigade Road Cross, Bangalore 560001.

de Neufville JI. Planning Theory and Practice: Bridging the Gap. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1983 Jul [cited 2020 Jun 24];3(1):35–45. Available from: https://journals.

sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0739456X8300300105

Tasan-Kok T, Bertolini L, Oliveira e Costa S, Lothan H, Carvalho H, Desmet M, et al. “Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”: giving voice to planning practitioners. Planning Theory and Practice. 2016 Oct;17(4):621–51

Puketapu-Dentice K, Connelly S, Thompson-Fawcett M. towards integrating Indigenous culture in urban form. Available from: https://

www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/20

/03/JSSJ11_7_VA.pdf

Tanjia Chowdhury. IRJET-V5I974. ResearchGate. unknown; 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329913143_IRJET-V5I974

Shanu Raina, Bhagyalaxmi S Madapur, The Potential and Relevance of Indigenous Knowledge System of City Planning Principles in Shaping Contemporary Urban Milieu, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395–0056, p-ISSN: 2395–0072, Volume: 05 Issue: 08 Aug 2018 www.irjet.net, Page 312

Porter L. Coexistence in cities: The challenge of Indigenous urban planning in the twenty-first century. Research Gate. unknown; 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289222405_Coexistence_in_cities_The_challenge_of_Indigenous_urban_planning_in_the_twenty-first_

century

Edmund N. Bacon. Design of Cities. 2011. Available from: http://www.

arch.ttu.edu/people/faculty/ellis_c/ARCH4000/Bacon%20Design%20of%20Cities.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/.v3i1.584

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.