Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Bridging the Urban Divide: A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Communicative Planning Measures in Bangladesh

Anutosh Das

Abstract


For any development initiative to be met, planning is crucial which involves choice making for societies and individuals to pursue the stated goals. Bangladesh, a rapidly growing country, faces several problems ranging from finding the effective ways of tackling urban poverty to deal with unplanned urbanization. The emergence of a bottom-up participatory approach reflecting the needs and demand of all social strata in the plan-making process is a far cry for countries like Bangladesh. However, despite strong and firm policy guidelines for enhancing the participatory planning approach, lack of strong role of city development authorities and communication gap, their bureaucratic decision making mind setup predominantly hinders the way to ensure pro-poor participation in policy making and people-centered planning in Bangladesh. Therefore, this particular research focuses on the investigation of necessity and manifestation of communicative rationale in the plan-making process, challenges as well as the level of participation required in the people-centered pro-poor planning in Bangladesh. The overarching methodological approach adopted for this study is case study approach including the interview of a local urban planner to recognize his own spatial needs, views on urban places as well as spatial footprints in the major cities of Bangladesh followed by his notion regarding the local and national plan-making process to generate a holistic view on the modes of planning in a developing country setup like Bangladesh. This study investigates the contemporary challenges faced by major metropolises in Bangladesh (Dhaka and Khulna with a high concentration of urban poor) to ensure the bottom-up participatory planning approach with a major focus on formulating effective pro-poor urban planning through engaging the people in the national policy-making process. The analysis and discussion uses an amalgamation of both primary and secondary databases through review of relevant literatures and interview of the key informant (Local Urban Planner). Findings demonstrate that, both in the plan-making and problem identification process, the participation of the urban poor, as well as general people, was negligible. This furthermore results in the failure of the national polices and priority setting process to address the demands and needs of the urban poor properly in Bangladesh. The findings of this study will act as a baseline for wider and growing pro-poor participatory planning literature.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Rahman, M.A.U. (2016), Urban sustainability through strategic planning: A case of metropolitan planning in Khulna city, Bangladesh, Journal of Urban Management, Vol. 5(1), 16–22. doi:10.1016/j.jum.2016. 06.001

The World Bank (2018), New year with a fresh start: Addressing urban poverty in Bangladesh, https://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/new-year-fresh-start-addrzessing-urban-poverty-bangladesh, (last accessed on 13/12/2019).

Bangladesh Urban Forum (2011), Bangladesh’s Urban Future; Making Cities and Towns Work for All, Paper presented at the 1st Bangladesh Urban Forum, Bangabandhu

International Conference Centre (BICC), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Boyle, M., McWilliams, C., and Rice, G. (2008), The Spatialities of Actually Exisitng Neoliberalism in Glasgow, 1977 to Present, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Vol 91(3), pp.289–294.

Harvey, D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sowgat, T., Wang, Y.P., McWilliams, C. (2016). Pro-poorness of planning policies in Bangladesh: the case of Khulna city. International Planning Studies, 22(2), 145–160. doi:10.1080/13563475.2016.1220287

Watson, V. (2009a), Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues, Urban Studies, Vol. 46, pp. 1–17.

Devas, N. (2001), Does City Governance Matter for the Urban Poor?, International Planning Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 393–408.

Mitlin, D. (2000), Addressing Urban Poverty: Increasing Incomes, Reducing Costs, and Securing Representation, Development in Practice, Vol. 10, pp. 204–215.

Tibaijuka, A. (2006), The Importance of Urban Planning in Urban Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development, Vancouver: The World Planners Congress.

Wratten, E. (1995), Conceptualizing Urban Poverty, Environment and Urbanisation, Vol. 7, pp. 11–38.

Watson, V. (2009b), The Planned City Sweeps the Poor Away: Urban Planning and 21st Century Urbanisation, Progress in Planning, Vol. 72, pp. 151–193.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) (2011), Bangladesh Population Census 2001, Zila series. Report, Ministry of Planning, Dhaka.

The World Bank (2018), Urban population (% of total population) – Bangladesh, United Nations Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: 2018 Revision, https://data.worldbank. org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locations=BD, (last accessed on 15/12/2019).

The Daily Star (2019), More poor in urban areas by 2030, The Daily Star, December 16, https://www.thedailystar.net/ front page/news/more-poor-urban-areas-2030–1810783, (last accessed on 12 December,2019).

Forester J., (1999), Reflections on the Future Understanding of Planing Practice, International Planning Studies, Vol. 4, pp. 175–193.

Das, A. (2020), Low Carbon Growth, Climate Change and Sustainable Development Nexus: The Tale of Hong Kong, Journal of Environmental Engineering and its Scope, Vol. 2 (3), pp. 01–10.

Friedmann, J. (1987), Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Habermas, J. (1984), the Theory of Communicative Action, Boston: Beacon Press.

Healey, P. (1999), Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places, Journal of planning education and research, Vol.19, pp.111–121.

Atkinson, R., and Moon, G. (1994), Urban Policy in Britain. London: St Martin Press.

Godschalk, D., Parham, D., Porter, D., Potapchuk, W. and Schukraft, S. (1994), Pulling Together: A Planning Development Consensus-Building Manual, Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

Healey, P. (1997), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, University of British Columbia Publication.

Healey, P. (2006), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2003), Collaborative Policymaking: Governance through Dialogue. Deliberative policy analysis, Understanding governance in the network society, pp. 33–59.

Susskind, L. and Cruikshank, J. (1987), Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes, New York: Basic Books.

Sager, T. (1994), Communicative Planning Theory, (Aldershot: Avebury).

Watson, V. (2002), The Usefulness of Normative Planning Theories in the Context of Sub- Saharan Africa, Planning Theory, Vol.1, pp. 27–52.

Fainstein, S. (2000), New Directions in Planning Theory, Urban affairs review, Vol. 35, p. 451.

Cristancho, CE. (2009), Pro-Poor Planning: A Tool for Strategic Territorial Planning and a Conceptual Framework Drawn from Studies in Colombia and Costa Rica, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University, Sweeden.

Essama-Nssah, B. (2005), A Unified Framework for Pro-Poor Growth Analysis. Economics Letters, Vol. 89, pp. 216–221.

Arnstein, SR. (1969), A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of planners, Vol. 35(4), pp. 216–224.

Crook, RC. (2003), Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction in Africa: The Politics of Local- Central Relations. Public Administration and Development, Vol. 23, pp. 77–88.

Berke, P. R. (2002), Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for the Twenty-First Century, Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 17.

Hester, R. (1996), Wanted: Local Participation with a View, Public and private places, pp. 42–52.

Yiftachel, O. (1989), Towards a New Typology of Urban Planning Theories. Environment and Planning, Planning and Design, Vol.16, pp. 23–39.

Campbell, S. and Fainstein, S. (2003), Intrroduction:The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory. In: CAMPBELL S and FAINSTEIN S (eds.) Readinga in Planning Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Khan, S. and Swapan, SH. (2014), From blueprint master plans to democratic planning in South Asian cities: Pursuing good governance agenda against prevalent patron–client networks, Habitat International, Vol.38, pp.183–191.

Rahman (2012). Development Planning Process in Bangladesh: Special focus on project formulation appraisal and approval procedure, http://erd.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/erd.portal.gov.bd/page/2f97258a_6f25_479a_8545_a498c65783f

/Development%20Project%20Planning%20Process%20of%20BD%207FYP%20and%20BDP%202100.pdf, , (last accessed on 11/12/2019).

Roy, S., Ahmed, M. U., Islam, S. M. T., Anjum, N., Mondal, J., Rahman, M. (2018). Bangladesh: National Urban Policies and City Profiles for Dhaka and Khulna, GCRF Centre for Sustainable, Healthy and Learning Cities and Neighborhood (SHLC).

Sawgat, T. (2012), Pro-poor planning in Bangladesh: A case study of Khulna city, Unpublished Phd thesis, Heriot-Watt University.

Wakil, A. (2019, December 10), Personal Physical open-ended Interview with the urban planner.

Roy, M. (2005). Planning for sustainable urbanisation in developing countries: A case study in Dhaka, Bangladesh, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Manchester.

Roy, M. (2009). Planning for sustainable urbanisation in fast growing cities: Mitigation and adaptation issues addressed in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Habitat International, 33(3), 276–286. doi:10.1016/j. habitatint.2008.10.022


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.