Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Social Housing: Corporate Management Approaches in the UK

Simon Peter Taylor

Abstract


The social housing sector in Britain has undergone significant change over the last four decades since 1980. Under the economic and political ideology of Neoliberalism, the introduction of market forces into the arena of public service provision has resulted in the evolution of a competitive operational environment for Social Housing Providers (SHPs). These organizations have to operate as businesses and meet the challenges of functioning as independent firms that are regulated by the state. They can borrow finance on the private markets to fund their activities and diversify their operations to seek new streams of business. The expectation is that they will operate as efficient and effective businesses that provide safe homes for their customers. As well as operating along business lines, SHPs are expected to fulfil a social purpose to provide for those in society with a housing need and who cannot access housing through the market mechanism. This article looks at the rise of corporatism in the social housing sector. It explores types of management theory that are being used by SHPs to create organizations that deliver effective services as well as efficient businesses that survive in a competitive age. Approaches to the management of values are considered in terms of benefits to customers and as guiding parameters for staff in these organizations. The article then asks if these approaches have benefitted customers and reflects on the challenges that SHPs face in fulfilling their obligations as business with a social purpose.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Manzi T, Morrison N. Risk, Commercialism and Social Purpose: Repositioning the English Housing Association Sector, Urban Studies. 2018; 55 (9): 1924–1942.

Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005; 2.

Cerny PG. Embedding Neoliberalism: The Evolution of a Hegemonic Paradigm, The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy. 2008; 2: 2.

Taylor S. Neoliberalism and the marketization of social housing: A study of four countries, International Journal of Science: Basic and Applied. 2017; 36(7): 60–51.

Niebor N, Gruis V. Shifting back–changing organisational strategies in Dutch Social Housing, Journal of Housing and Built Environment. 2014; 29:1–13.

Billis D. Hybrid organizations and the third sector: challenges for practice, theory and policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010; 46–69.

Milligan V, Hulse K, Davison G. Understanding leadership, strategy and organisational dynamics in the not-for-profit housing sector, Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 2013.

Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA, Moran P. A new manifesto for management, Sloan Management Review, Spring. 1999; 40: 3.

Malpass P. Housing Associations and Housing Policy: A Historical Perspective London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2000.

Mullins D, Pawson P. Housing associations: agents of policy or profits in disguise? in D Billis (ed) Hybrid Organisation and the Third Sector. Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010; 197–218.

Lee RV, Fabish L, McGaw N. The value of Corporate Values, Strategy & Business. 2005; (39).

Martin JD, Petty JW. Value Based Management: The Corporate Response to the Shareholder Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ulaga W. Customer Value in Business Markets: An Agenda for Inquiry, Industrial Marketing Management. 2001; 30 (4): 315–319.

Kemeny J. Corporatism and Housing Regimes, Housing, Theory and Society. 2006; 23(1): 1–18.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.