Thermal Comfort Indices

Authors

  • Chaitali Basu School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi
  • Shibanni Pandita School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37628/jepd.v2i2.162

Abstract

Today the way we design buildings have produced many unexpected environmental problems, and the new air conditioning technologies permitted control of situations which had previously been accepted along with the rest of weather. The measurement of the thermal indices is a very complex measure hence innumerous research has been done over the years to find out the most desirable parameter of defining thermal comfort. Hence, ten papers were studied with the aim of finding ‘optimum environment’ which would allow no discomfort and produce maximum performance with minimum strain. The objectives are to compare and contrast the findings not for ‘what is best?’, but ‘what is acceptable?’ The paper presents study of both rational and adaptive thermal comfort. Together these findings suggest that if the desired results are to be obtained the designer must be conscious of a number of factors which psychologically affect human comfort like effective temperature, heat production, moisture losses, air motion and humidity.

References

. G. Caunei-Florescu. Thermal comfort

index, Termotehnica. 2013;1.

. E. Teodoreanu. Thermal comfort

index, Pres Environ Sust Develop.

; 10(2):105-118p.

. N. Djongyang, R. Tchinda, D.

Njomo. Thermal comfort: A review

paper, Renew Sust Ener Rev.

;14(9):2626-264p.

. J. Pickup, R. de Dear. An outdoor

thermal comfort index (OUT_SET*)-

part I-the model and its assumptions.

In Biometeorology and urban

climatology at the turn of the

millennium, ICB-ICUC. 2000; 99:

-283p.

. JL. Hensen. On the thermal

interaction of building structure and

Pandita and Basu

heating and ventilating system.

Technische Universiteitt Eindhoven.

. KN. Rhee, KW. Kim. A 50 year

review of basic and applied research

in radiant heating and cooling

systems for the built environment,

Build Environ. 2015; 91:166-90p.

. C. KE. Fanger’s thermal comfort and

draught

models.

Institute

for

Research in Construction National

Research Council of Canada, Ottawa,

K1A 0R6, Canada IRC Research

Report RR-162 October. 2003;10.

. R. De Dear, GS. Brager. The

adaptive model of thermal comfort

and energy conservation in the built

environment, Int J Biometeorol.

; 45(2):100-8p.

. RL. Hwang, MJ. Cheng, TP. Lin,

MC. Ho. Thermal perceptions,

general adaptation methods and

occupant's idea about the trade-off

between thermal comfort and energy

saving in hot–humid regions, Build

Environ. 2009;44(6):1128-34p.

. LH. Newburgh. Physiology of Heat

Regulation and the Science of

Clothing. Physiology of heat

regulation and the science of

clothing.1949.

. DR. Oughton. Air Conditioning

System Design for Buildings. In: AF.

C Sherratt (Eds). England: McGraw-

Hill Book Company (UK) limited;

. WH. Severns. Air Conditioning and

Refrigeration. In: J. Wiley (Eds).

Japan: Toppan Printing Company

Limited; 1958.

. RZ. Freire, GH. Santos, LD. Coelho.

Hygrothermal dynamic and mould

growth risk predictions for concrete

tiles by using least squares support

vector machines, Energ. 2017;

(8):1093p.

Published

2017-09-12

Issue

Section

Articles