Developing Design Process Management in Infrastructure and Construction Engineering

Pragya Tiwari

Abstract


Problems in buildings can often be traced back to the requirements processing in the design phases. In building design, requirements processing is mainly discussed under the term briefing and is a critical and a problematic process. This study focuses on the design stage and aims to summarize and analyze requirements’ processing concepts and practices by a systematic review. The main problems, guidelines, tools and methods were analyzed and compared to the requirements engineering and management approaches. The findings indicate lack of consensus about key concepts and about the coverage of requirements processing, lack of applied methods and lack of practitioners’ knowledge. From the gaps, we proposed a definition for the key concepts, and scheme of this whole requirements processing in building design and indicate recommendations for future research, which can guide important contributions, especially if supported by practical experiences. Building construction projects worldwide routinely fail to meet their schedule and cost objectives. The current paper basically emphases on design changes as the main contributing factors to delay and cost overruns. Substandard project coordination and futile communication management are sustained problems with the construction industry, particularly as to the management of design changes. To rectify the captioned issues, this study is aimed at exploring the underlying causes of design changes, the resulting rework that is damaging to project performance, communication management process and collaboration in a project-based setting through the review of the literature. A conceptual model for design change management was then expressed to be the distinguished outcome of this study. The framework describes the importance of applying effective communication process and informed management decision in dealing with design changes. It provides a coherent and holistic view to understand the dynamics of design changes in a building construction project. The findings contribute useful starting point for future overrun causation and mitigation studies.

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Leventhal and S. Newman Housing and child development. Child Youth Service Rev 2010; 32: 1165–1174p.

G.W. Evans. The environment of childhood poverty. Am Psychologist 2004; 59: 77–92. 27. Newman SJ.Housing attributes and serious mental illness: implications for research and practice. Psychiatric Ser. 2001; 52: 1309–1317p.

P. Howden-Chapman and R. Chapman. Health co-benefits from housing-related policies. Curr Opinion Environ Sustain. 2012; 4: 414–419p.

C. Liddell, C. Morris. Fuel poverty and human health: a review of recent evidence. Energy Pol. 2010; 38: 2987–2997p.

C. Goodacre, S. Sharples, P. Smith. Integrating energy efficiency with the social agenda in sustainability. Energy Build. 2002; 34: 53–61p.

J. Gilbertson, M. Grimsley, G. Green. Psychosocial routes from housing investment to health: evidence from England’s home energy efficiency scheme. Energy Pol. 2012; 49: 122–133p.

J. Rudge, R. Gilchrist. Excess winter morbidity among older people at risk of cold homes: a population-based study in a London borough. J Public Health. 2005; 27: 353–358p.

N. Daykin, E. Byrne, T. Soteriou, S. O’Connor. Review: The impact of art, design and environment in mental healthcare: a systematic review of the literature. J Royal Soc Prom Health 2008; 128: 85–94p.

R. Ghazali and M.Y. Abbas. Quality physical environment in pediatric wards: designer’s creation versus users’ satisfaction. Procedia-Social Behavio Sci. 2012; 35: 221–229p.

M.Y. Abbas, R. Ghazali. Healing environment of pediatric wards. Procedia-Soc Behavio Sci. 2010; 5: 948–957p.

J. Varni, T. Burwinkle, P. Dickinson, S. Sherman, P. Dixon, J. Ervice, P. Leyden, B. Sadler. Evaluation of the built environment at a children’s convalescent hospital: development of the pediatric Quality of LifeInventory TM parent and staff satisfaction measures for pediatric health care facilities. J Develop Behavior Pediatr. 2004; 25: 10–20p.

G. Wieslander, D. Norba¨ck, K. Nordstro¨m, R. Wa˚linder, P. Venge. Nasal and ocular symptoms, tear film stability and biomarkers in nasal lavage, in relation to building-dampness and building design in hospitals. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1999; 72: 451–461p.

K. Hurst. UK wards design: patient dependency, nursing workload, staffing and quality – an observational study. Int J Nurs Studies. 2008; 45: 370–381p.

M. Dzikuc, J. Adamczyk..The ecological and economic aspects of a low emission limitation: a case study for Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2015;20:217–225p.

H. Thomson, M. Petticrew. Housing and health. Br Med J. 2007; 334: 434–435p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/.v1i1.322

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.