Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Rural Broadband Adoption: Exploring Utah’s Broadband Adoption Factors Associated with Broadband Adoption in Utah

Ryan Merlin Yonk

Abstract


Access to High Speed Internet Service across the United States has become a policy priority for both federal officials and state and local governments. To achieve this priority significant funds have been provided to better understand how full deployment could occur. The logic of these attempts has been focused on the hypothesis that a lack of deployment in underserved areas is the primary factor preventing High Speed Internet use. We test this hypothesis by developing a model of High Speed Internet uptake using FTC data and test that model using data from a telephone survey conducted by the Utah Broadband Project. We find that like most other models of consumer selection individual demographic and preference are the dominant factors in decisions to utilize high speed internet. Despite this finding our results also suggest that those preferences are conditioned by the availability of multiple provider options.


Full Text:

PDF

References


America. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6/7), 359–373. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.

04.004

Federal Communications Commission. (2011). FCC and Connect to Compete Broadband Fact Sheet. (www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-and-connect-compete-broadband-fact-sheet).

Dabson B, Keller J. (2008). Rural Broadband. Rural Policy Research Institute. (www.rupri.org/Forms/RuralBroadbandFinal.pdf).

Smith A. Summary of Findings: Home Broadband 2010. Pew Internet. (http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Home-Broadband-2010/Summary-of-Findings.aspx)

Government Accounting Office (GAO) (2006) Government Accounting Office (GAO) (2006). Broadband Deployment is Extensive throughout the United States, but it is Difficult to Assess the Extent of Deployment Gaps in Rural Areas. (www.gao.gov/new.items/d06426.pdf).

Government Accounting Office (GAO) (2010) National Broadband Plan Reflects the Experiences of Leading Countries, but Implementation Will be Challenging. (www.gao.gov/new.items/d10825.pdf).

Copps MJ. (2009). Bringing Broadband to Rural America: Report on a Rural Broadband Strategy. Federal Communications Commission. (hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291012A1.pdf).

Federal Communications Commission. (2010). Form 477 Filers by State. (Filing date 6/30/10), posted 3/22/11: (www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html).

LaRose R, Gregg JL, Strover S, Straubhaar J, Carpenter S. Closing the Rural Broadband Gap: Promoting Adoption of the Internet in Rural America. Telecommunications Policy, (2007); 31(6–7): 259–373. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Government Accounting Office (GAO) (2011). Recovery Act: Broadband programs awards and risks to oversight. (http://www.gao.gov

/new.items/d11371t.pdf).

Vye D. The Broadband Initiative of 2009. Microwave Journal, (2009); 52(10): 22–38. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Kandilov IT, Renkow M. Infrastructure Investment and Rural Economic Development: An Evaluation of USDA's Broadband Loan Program. Growth & Change, (2010); 41(2): 165–191. doi:10.1111/

j.1468–2257.2010.00524.x

Yonk R, Simmons R. (2014) Utah’s Broadband Nonadopters. Institute of Political Economy Utah State University. (https://broadband.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/FINAL.

pdf)

Horrigan, Murray, Horrigan J, Murray, K. Rural broadband Internet use. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (http://www.pewinternet.

org/Reports/2006/Home-Broadband-Adoption-in-Rural-America/Data-Memo.aspx).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/jrrpd.v5i2.512

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.