A Realist Philosophical Approach for Housing Research: Critical Realism
Abstract
Abstract
The development of housing studies as an academic discipline from its roots in the 1970s has seen research undertaken into a range of phenomena associated with housing, home and society. Different philosophical approaches have been adopted by housing researchers in their studies to help them to carry out their explorations, examinations and investigations. This article presents an analysis of one philosophical approach which can help the housing researcher in their quest for knowledge. It looks at the philosophy of Critical Realism (CR), the relationship that it has with housing studies and how it can be used as an approach within housing research. Three core aspects are looked at through three parts within the article. The first part provides an introduction to CR, describing key aspects and highlighting fundament parts of the philosophical approach. The second part of the article considers the role of philosophy in relation to research and the overall approaches that underlie philosophical approaches. The third part of the article focuses on realism in housing research and compares social constructionist and CR approaches within this philosophical tradition in relation to their appropriateness for research within the field of housing studies. At the end of the article the main strands are brought together in a concluding section.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
BHASKAR R, (1998), The logic of discovery. IN M ARCHER, R BHASKAR, A COLLIER, T LAWSON AND A NORRIE, Critical Realism: Essential Readings, London: Routledge, 16-47
LAWSON J M, (2002), Thin Rationality, Weak Constructionism and Critical Realism. The way forward in housing theory? Housing Theory and Society, 19 (3/4), 142-144
LAWSON J M, (2001), Comparing the Causal Mechanisms underlying Housing Networks over Time and Space, Netherland Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Amsterdam
BHASKAR R, (1975), Realist Theory of Science, London: Verso
BHASKAR R, (1989), Reclaiming Reality, A Critical Introduction in Contemporary Philosophy, London: Verso
BHASKAR R, (1991), Philosophy and the idea of freedom, Oxford: Blackwell
BHASKAR R, (1998a), Critical Realism, New York: Routledge
BHASKAR R, (1998b), The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, New York: Routledge
COLLIER A, (1994), Critical Realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy, London: Verso
ARCHER M S, (1995), Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
ARCHER M S, (1996), Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
ARCHER M S, (2000), Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
ARCHER M S, (2003), Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
ARCHER M S, (2007), Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
SAYER A, (1984), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, London: Routledge
SAYER A, (1992), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (Second Ed), London: Routledge
SAYER A, (2000), Realism and Social Science, London: SAGE Publications
SAYER A, (2010), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, (Revised Second Ed), London: Routledge
DYSON S AND BROWN B, (2005), Social Theory and Applied Health Research, Buckingham: Open University Press
RYAN S AND S PORTER, (1996), ‘Breaking the boundaries between Nursing and Sociology: A Critical Realist Ethnography of the Theory-Practice Gap’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24: 413-420
WAINWRIGHT S P, (1997), ‘A new paradigm for Nursing: the potential of Realism’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26: 1262-1271
FLEETWOOD S AND ACKROYD S, (2004), Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies, London: Routledge
HOUSTON S, (2010), ‘Prising Open the Black Box: Critical Realism, Action Research and Social Work’, Qualitative Social Work, 9(1): 73-91
FITZPATRICK S, (2005), Explaining Homelessness: A Critical Realist Perspective, Housing, Theory and Society, Vol 22, no 1 1-17
SCHOSTAK J, (2002), Critiquing Critical Realism: A Working Paper, ECER Conference, Portugal
PROUT A, (2005), The Future of Childhood: Towards the Interdisciplinary Study of Children, London: Routledge Falmer Press
O’MAHONEY J AND VINCENT S, (2014), Critical Realism as an Empirical Project. IN P EDWARDS, J O’MAHONEY AND S VINCENT (Eds), Studying Organisations using Critical Realism – A Practical Guide, Oxford: Oxford University Press
BHASKAR R, (1978), A Realist Theory of Science, Hassocks: Harvester Press
EASTON G, (2009), Critical Realism in Case Studies, Industrial Marketing Management, 39, pp 118-128
BUNGE M, (2004), ‘How does it work? The search for Explanatory Mechanisms, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 2 pp 182-210
BRYGSTAD B AND MUNKVOLD B E, (2011), In Search of Mechanisms. Conducting a Critical Realist Data Analysis, Thirty Second International conference on Information Systems, Shanghai
MINGERS J AND WILCOCKS L P (Eds), (2004), Domains of the Real, the Actual and the Empirical, Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, London: John Wiley
SMITH S P AND JOHNSTON R B, (2014), How Critical Realism Clarifies Validity Issues in Information Systems Theory-Testing Research, Scandinavian journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 5-28
SALMON W C, (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton: Princeton University Press
HULSWIT M, (2002), From Cause to Causation: A Peircean Perspective, Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers
RADUESCU C AND VESSEY I, (2008), Causality in Critical Realism Research: An Analysis of three Explanatory Models, International Association for Critical Realism Annual Conference, London 11-13 July 2008
PAWSON R, (2008) ‘Causality for Beginners’, ESRC/NCRM Research Methods Festival.
HARRE R, (1970), The Principles of Scientific Thinking, London: Macmillan
HARRE R AND MADDEN E H, (1975), Causal Powers, Oxford: Blackwell
BHASKAR R, (1975), Realist Theory of Science, London: Verso
SOMERVILLE P, (2012), Critical Realism, International Encyclopaedia of Housing & Home, Elsevier, pp 291-295
BRAMLEY G AND FITZPATRICK S, (2017), Homelessness in the UK: Who is most at Risk? Housing Studies, 1-21
ELDER-VASS D, (2005), Emergence and the Realist Account of Cause, Journal of Critical Realism, 4:2, pp 315-38.
MIHATA K, (1997), The persistence of "emergence"'. In RAYMOND A EVE, SARA HORSFALL AND MARY E LEE, Chaos, Complexity, and Sociology Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage
BUCKLEY W, (1998), Society: A Complex Adaptive System, Australia: Gordon and Breach
EMMECHE C, KOPPE S AND STJERNFELT, (1997), Explaining emergence: towards an ontology of levels, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 28:1
ARCHER M, (1982), 'Morphogenesis versus Structuration', British Journal of Sociology, 33, 455-83
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (ESRC), (2007), Research Ethics Framework, Swindon: ESRC
MERTENS D, (2005), Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (Second Ed), Boston: SAGE Publications
NEW C, (2007), Realising the Potential: The ESRC Seminar Series on Social Realism and Empirical Research, Journal of Critical Realism, 4(1), 4347.
KNIGHT A AND TURNBULL N, (2008), Epistemology. IN A KNIGHT AND L RUDDOCK (Eds), Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell
CROTTY M, (2003), The Foundations of Social Research (Secons Ed), London; SAGE Publications
GRIX J, (2004), The Foundations of Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan
BRYMAN A, (2004), Social research methods (Second Ed), New York: Oxford University Press
HOLDEN M T AND LYNCH P, (2004), Choosing the Appropriate Methodology: Understanding Research Philosophy, The Marketing Review, 4, (4), 347-409
KULATUNGA K, AMARATUNGA D AND HAIGH R, (2008), Researching ‘Construction, Client and Innovation’: Pilot study and analysis, Salford: University of Salford
BURRELL G AND MORGAN G, (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational
Analysis, Hampshire: Ashgate.
EVELY A C, FAZEY I, PINARD M AND LAMBIN X, (2008), The influence of philosophical perspectives in integrative research: A conservation case study in the Cairngorms National Park, Ecology and Society, 13(2): 52
SAUNDERS M, LEWIS P AND THORNHILL A, (2003), Research Methods for Business Students (Third Ed), London: Pearson Education
KEMENY J, KERSLOOT J AND THALMANN P, (2005), Non-Profit Housing influencing, leading and dominating the Unitary Rental Market: Three Case Studies, Housing Studies, 20 (6): 855-872
BALL M AND HARLOE M, (1992), Rhetorical barriers to understanding housing provision: What the 'provision thesis' is and is not, Housing Studies, 7(1), 3-15.
FRANKLIN B AND CLAPHAM D, (1997), ‘The Social Construction of Housing Management’, Housing Studies, 12(1), 7-26
DIDACTIC ENCYCLOPEDIA, (2015), What is the Meaning of Realism.
PUTNAM H, (1999), The threefold cord: Mind, Body and World, New York: Columbia University Press
MULAIK S, (2010), Linear Causal Modelling with Structural Equalities, Journal of Classification, 27 (3), pp 404-407
CHAKRAVARRTY A, (2004), Structuralism as a form of Scientific Realism, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18:151–171
YEUNG H W, (1997), Critical Realism and Realist Research in Human Geography: A Method or a Philosophy in Search of a Method? Progress in Human Geography 21:51–74
BASSET K AND SHORT J, (1980), Housing and Residential Structure, London: Routledge and Keagan Paul
PARK R E, BURGESS E W AND MCKENZIE R D, (1925), The City, Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press
ALONSO W, (1964), Location and Land Use, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
PAHL R E, (1975), Whose City? (Second Ed), Harmondsworth: Penguin
HARVEY D, (1973), Social Justice and the City, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press
CASTELLS M, (1977), The Urban Question, London: Arnold
ENGELS F, (1872), The Housing Question, Moscow: Progress Publishers
LAWSON J M, (2009), A review of structurally inspired approaches in housing studies – concepts, contributions and future perspectives, Paper presented to RC 43 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Housing Assets, Housing People, Glasgow September 1 – 4, 2009
BALL M, (1983) Housing Policy and Economic Power: The Political Economy of Owner Occupation, London: Methuen
BALL M, (1998) Institutions in British Property Research: A Review, Urban Studies, 35: 1501-1517
BALL M, (1988), Housing provision and comparative housing research. In Housing and social change in Europe and the USA. IN M BALL. M HARLOE AND M MARTENS (Eds), New York: Routledge
AMBROSE P, (1991), The Housing Provision Chain as a Comparative Analytical Framework, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 8 (2): 91-104
AMBROSE P, (1994), Urban Process and Power, London: Routledge
BALL M, (1986), Housing Analysis: Time for a Theoretical Refocus? Housing Studies, 1 (3): 147-165
GORE T AND NICHOLSON D, (1991), Models of the Land Development Process: A Critical Review, Environment and Planning, Vo1.23 pp 705-730
Giddens A, (1984), The Constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Thousand Oaks, CA: University of California Press
HARLOE M, (1995), The Peoples Home: Social Rented Housing in Europe and America, Oxford: Blackwell
KEMENY J, (1995), From Public Housing to Social Market: Rental Policy in Comparative Perspective, London: Routledge
JACOBS K, KEMENY J AND MANZI T, (2017), Introduction. IN K JACOBS, J KEMENY AND T MANZI (Eds), Social Constructionism in Housing Research, Routledge
SOMERVILLE P AND BENGTSSON B, (2002), Constructionism, Realism and Social Theory, Housing, Theory and Society, 19: 3-4, 121-136
CLAPHAM D, (2018), Remaking Housing Policy: An international Study, London: Routledge
GIBB K AND MARSH A, (2019), Housing and Systems Thinking (working paper), Glasgow: Cache
FOPP R J, (2008), 'Social Constructionism and Housing Studies: A Critical Reflection', Urban Policy and Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 159-175
JACOBS K AND MANZI T, (2013), Modernisation, Marketisation and Housing Reform: The use of evidence based policy as a Rationality Discourse, People, Place & Policy Online, 7/1, pp. 1-13.
KING P, (2004), ‘Relativism, Subjectivity and the Self: A Critique of Social Constructionism.’ IN K JACOBS, J KEMENY AND T MANZI, Social constructionism in Housing Research Hampshire, England: Ashgate, 32-48
WOOLGAR S AND PAWLUCH D, (1985), ‘Ontological Gerrymandering’, Social Problems, 32: 214-227
COLLIN F, (1997), Social Reality, London: Routledge
CRUIKSHANK J, (2011), The positive and the negative - Assessing critical realism and social constructionism as post-positivist approaches to empirical research in the social sciences. Working Paper 42, Oxford: Oxford University
TAYLOR S P, (2018), Critical Realism vs Social Constructionism & Social Constructivism: Application to a Social Housing Research Study, International Journal of Science: Basic and Applied, Vol 37, Issue 2, pp 216-222
JACOBS K AND MANZI T, (2000), ‘Evaluating the Social Constructivist Paradigm in Housing Research’, Housing, Theory and Society, 17: 35-42
SOMERVILLE P, (1994), On Explanations of Policy, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 11 (4): 211–230
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijhhsp.v6i2.679
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.