Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Realist Philosophical Approach for Housing Research: Critical Realism

Simon Peter Taylor

Abstract


Abstract

The development of housing studies as an academic discipline from its roots in the 1970s has seen research undertaken into a range of phenomena associated with housing, home and society. Different philosophical approaches have been adopted by housing researchers in their studies to help them to carry out their explorations, examinations and investigations. This article presents an analysis of one philosophical approach which can help the housing researcher in their quest for knowledge. It looks at the philosophy of Critical Realism (CR), the relationship that it has with housing studies and how it can be used as an approach within housing research. Three core aspects are looked at through three parts within the article. The first part provides an introduction to CR, describing key aspects and highlighting fundament parts of the philosophical approach. The second part of the article considers the role of philosophy in relation to research and the overall approaches that underlie philosophical approaches. The third part of the article focuses on realism in housing research and compares social constructionist and CR approaches within this philosophical tradition in relation to their appropriateness for research within the field of housing studies. At the end of the article the main strands are brought together in a concluding section. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


References

BHASKAR R, (1998), The logic of discovery. IN M ARCHER, R BHASKAR, A COLLIER, T LAWSON AND A NORRIE, Critical Realism: Essential Readings, London: Routledge, 16-47

LAWSON J M, (2002), Thin Rationality, Weak Constructionism and Critical Realism. The way forward in housing theory? Housing Theory and Society, 19 (3/4), 142-144

LAWSON J M, (2001), Comparing the Causal Mechanisms underlying Housing Networks over Time and Space, Netherland Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Amsterdam

BHASKAR R, (1975), Realist Theory of Science, London: Verso

BHASKAR R, (1989), Reclaiming Reality, A Critical Introduction in Contemporary Philosophy, London: Verso

BHASKAR R, (1991), Philosophy and the idea of freedom, Oxford: Blackwell

BHASKAR R, (1998a), Critical Realism, New York: Routledge

BHASKAR R, (1998b), The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, New York: Routledge

COLLIER A, (1994), Critical Realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy, London: Verso

ARCHER M S, (1995), Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

ARCHER M S, (1996), Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

ARCHER M S, (2000), Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

ARCHER M S, (2003), Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

ARCHER M S, (2007), Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

SAYER A, (1984), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, London: Routledge

SAYER A, (1992), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (Second Ed), London: Routledge

SAYER A, (2000), Realism and Social Science, London: SAGE Publications

SAYER A, (2010), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, (Revised Second Ed), London: Routledge

DYSON S AND BROWN B, (2005), Social Theory and Applied Health Research, Buckingham: Open University Press

RYAN S AND S PORTER, (1996), ‘Breaking the boundaries between Nursing and Sociology: A Critical Realist Ethnography of the Theory-Practice Gap’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24: 413-420

WAINWRIGHT S P, (1997), ‘A new paradigm for Nursing: the potential of Realism’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26: 1262-1271

FLEETWOOD S AND ACKROYD S, (2004), Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies, London: Routledge

HOUSTON S, (2010), ‘Prising Open the Black Box: Critical Realism, Action Research and Social Work’, Qualitative Social Work, 9(1): 73-91

FITZPATRICK S, (2005), Explaining Homelessness: A Critical Realist Perspective, Housing, Theory and Society, Vol 22, no 1 1-17

SCHOSTAK J, (2002), Critiquing Critical Realism: A Working Paper, ECER Conference, Portugal

PROUT A, (2005), The Future of Childhood: Towards the Interdisciplinary Study of Children, London: Routledge Falmer Press

O’MAHONEY J AND VINCENT S, (2014), Critical Realism as an Empirical Project. IN P EDWARDS, J O’MAHONEY AND S VINCENT (Eds), Studying Organisations using Critical Realism – A Practical Guide, Oxford: Oxford University Press

BHASKAR R, (1978), A Realist Theory of Science, Hassocks: Harvester Press

EASTON G, (2009), Critical Realism in Case Studies, Industrial Marketing Management, 39, pp 118-128

BUNGE M, (2004), ‘How does it work? The search for Explanatory Mechanisms, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 2 pp 182-210

BRYGSTAD B AND MUNKVOLD B E, (2011), In Search of Mechanisms. Conducting a Critical Realist Data Analysis, Thirty Second International conference on Information Systems, Shanghai

MINGERS J AND WILCOCKS L P (Eds), (2004), Domains of the Real, the Actual and the Empirical, Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, London: John Wiley

SMITH S P AND JOHNSTON R B, (2014), How Critical Realism Clarifies Validity Issues in Information Systems Theory-Testing Research, Scandinavian journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 5-28

SALMON W C, (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton: Princeton University Press

HULSWIT M, (2002), From Cause to Causation: A Peircean Perspective, Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers

RADUESCU C AND VESSEY I, (2008), Causality in Critical Realism Research: An Analysis of three Explanatory Models, International Association for Critical Realism Annual Conference, London 11-13 July 2008

PAWSON R, (2008) ‘Causality for Beginners’, ESRC/NCRM Research Methods Festival.

HARRE R, (1970), The Principles of Scientific Thinking, London: Macmillan

HARRE R AND MADDEN E H, (1975), Causal Powers, Oxford: Blackwell

BHASKAR R, (1975), Realist Theory of Science, London: Verso

SOMERVILLE P, (2012), Critical Realism, International Encyclopaedia of Housing & Home, Elsevier, pp 291-295

BRAMLEY G AND FITZPATRICK S, (2017), Homelessness in the UK: Who is most at Risk? Housing Studies, 1-21

ELDER-VASS D, (2005), Emergence and the Realist Account of Cause, Journal of Critical Realism, 4:2, pp 315-38.

MIHATA K, (1997), The persistence of "emergence"'. In RAYMOND A EVE, SARA HORSFALL AND MARY E LEE, Chaos, Complexity, and Sociology Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage

BUCKLEY W, (1998), Society: A Complex Adaptive System, Australia: Gordon and Breach

EMMECHE C, KOPPE S AND STJERNFELT, (1997), Explaining emergence: towards an ontology of levels, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 28:1

ARCHER M, (1982), 'Morphogenesis versus Structuration', British Journal of Sociology, 33, 455-83

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (ESRC), (2007), Research Ethics Framework, Swindon: ESRC

MERTENS D, (2005), Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (Second Ed), Boston: SAGE Publications

NEW C, (2007), Realising the Potential: The ESRC Seminar Series on Social Realism and Empirical Research, Journal of Critical Realism, 4(1), 4347.

KNIGHT A AND TURNBULL N, (2008), Epistemology. IN A KNIGHT AND L RUDDOCK (Eds), Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell

CROTTY M, (2003), The Foundations of Social Research (Secons Ed), London; SAGE Publications

GRIX J, (2004), The Foundations of Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan

BRYMAN A, (2004), Social research methods (Second Ed), New York: Oxford University Press

HOLDEN M T AND LYNCH P, (2004), Choosing the Appropriate Methodology: Understanding Research Philosophy, The Marketing Review, 4, (4), 347-409

KULATUNGA K, AMARATUNGA D AND HAIGH R, (2008), Researching ‘Construction, Client and Innovation’: Pilot study and analysis, Salford: University of Salford

BURRELL G AND MORGAN G, (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational

Analysis, Hampshire: Ashgate.

EVELY A C, FAZEY I, PINARD M AND LAMBIN X, (2008), The influence of philosophical perspectives in integrative research: A conservation case study in the Cairngorms National Park, Ecology and Society, 13(2): 52

SAUNDERS M, LEWIS P AND THORNHILL A, (2003), Research Methods for Business Students (Third Ed), London: Pearson Education

KEMENY J, KERSLOOT J AND THALMANN P, (2005), Non-Profit Housing influencing, leading and dominating the Unitary Rental Market: Three Case Studies, Housing Studies, 20 (6): 855-872

BALL M AND HARLOE M, (1992), Rhetorical barriers to understanding housing provision: What the 'provision thesis' is and is not, Housing Studies, 7(1), 3-15.

FRANKLIN B AND CLAPHAM D, (1997), ‘The Social Construction of Housing Management’, Housing Studies, 12(1), 7-26

DIDACTIC ENCYCLOPEDIA, (2015), What is the Meaning of Realism.

PUTNAM H, (1999), The threefold cord: Mind, Body and World, New York: Columbia University Press

MULAIK S, (2010), Linear Causal Modelling with Structural Equalities, Journal of Classification, 27 (3), pp 404-407

CHAKRAVARRTY A, (2004), Structuralism as a form of Scientific Realism, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18:151–171

YEUNG H W, (1997), Critical Realism and Realist Research in Human Geography: A Method or a Philosophy in Search of a Method? Progress in Human Geography 21:51–74

BASSET K AND SHORT J, (1980), Housing and Residential Structure, London: Routledge and Keagan Paul

PARK R E, BURGESS E W AND MCKENZIE R D, (1925), The City, Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press

ALONSO W, (1964), Location and Land Use, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press

PAHL R E, (1975), Whose City? (Second Ed), Harmondsworth: Penguin

HARVEY D, (1973), Social Justice and the City, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press

CASTELLS M, (1977), The Urban Question, London: Arnold

ENGELS F, (1872), The Housing Question, Moscow: Progress Publishers

LAWSON J M, (2009), A review of structurally inspired approaches in housing studies – concepts, contributions and future perspectives, Paper presented to RC 43 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Housing Assets, Housing People, Glasgow September 1 – 4, 2009

BALL M, (1983) Housing Policy and Economic Power: The Political Economy of Owner Occupation, London: Methuen

BALL M, (1998) Institutions in British Property Research: A Review, Urban Studies, 35: 1501-1517

BALL M, (1988), Housing provision and comparative housing research. In Housing and social change in Europe and the USA. IN M BALL. M HARLOE AND M MARTENS (Eds), New York: Routledge

AMBROSE P, (1991), The Housing Provision Chain as a Comparative Analytical Framework, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 8 (2): 91-104

AMBROSE P, (1994), Urban Process and Power, London: Routledge

BALL M, (1986), Housing Analysis: Time for a Theoretical Refocus? Housing Studies, 1 (3): 147-165

GORE T AND NICHOLSON D, (1991), Models of the Land Development Process: A Critical Review, Environment and Planning, Vo1.23 pp 705-730

Giddens A, (1984), The Constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Thousand Oaks, CA: University of California Press

HARLOE M, (1995), The Peoples Home: Social Rented Housing in Europe and America, Oxford: Blackwell

KEMENY J, (1995), From Public Housing to Social Market: Rental Policy in Comparative Perspective, London: Routledge

JACOBS K, KEMENY J AND MANZI T, (2017), Introduction. IN K JACOBS, J KEMENY AND T MANZI (Eds), Social Constructionism in Housing Research, Routledge

SOMERVILLE P AND BENGTSSON B, (2002), Constructionism, Realism and Social Theory, Housing, Theory and Society, 19: 3-4, 121-136

CLAPHAM D, (2018), Remaking Housing Policy: An international Study, London: Routledge

GIBB K AND MARSH A, (2019), Housing and Systems Thinking (working paper), Glasgow: Cache

FOPP R J, (2008), 'Social Constructionism and Housing Studies: A Critical Reflection', Urban Policy and Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 159-175

JACOBS K AND MANZI T, (2013), Modernisation, Marketisation and Housing Reform: The use of evidence based policy as a Rationality Discourse, People, Place & Policy Online, 7/1, pp. 1-13.

KING P, (2004), ‘Relativism, Subjectivity and the Self: A Critique of Social Constructionism.’ IN K JACOBS, J KEMENY AND T MANZI, Social constructionism in Housing Research Hampshire, England: Ashgate, 32-48

WOOLGAR S AND PAWLUCH D, (1985), ‘Ontological Gerrymandering’, Social Problems, 32: 214-227

COLLIN F, (1997), Social Reality, London: Routledge

CRUIKSHANK J, (2011), The positive and the negative - Assessing critical realism and social constructionism as post-positivist approaches to empirical research in the social sciences. Working Paper 42, Oxford: Oxford University

TAYLOR S P, (2018), Critical Realism vs Social Constructionism & Social Constructivism: Application to a Social Housing Research Study, International Journal of Science: Basic and Applied, Vol 37, Issue 2, pp 216-222

JACOBS K AND MANZI T, (2000), ‘Evaluating the Social Constructivist Paradigm in Housing Research’, Housing, Theory and Society, 17: 35-42

SOMERVILLE P, (1994), On Explanations of Policy, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 11 (4): 211–230




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijhhsp.v6i2.679

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.